From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [linuximq] Re: [PATCH] pom-ng version of IMQ target (file is attached this time) Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 01:17:02 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40BD0E6E.7040608@trash.net> References: <40A29E4A.94165870@info-link.net> <40A2D9D8.2050201@trash.net> <40A39C34.639DC30E@info-link.net> <40BB2C43.90704@dsl.pipex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linuximq@yahoogroups.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Andy Furniss In-Reply-To: <40BB2C43.90704@dsl.pipex.com> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Andy Furniss wrote: > I am still not sure whether using Dummy will satisfy other IMQ users > though, the thread above just deals with my setup - using ingress IMQ. > There must be people on here using IMQ for egress/ multiple IMQs to > solve their own problems. I changed IMQ to hook before NAT for egress, > just to see if it worked, as someone on the LARTC list wanted to use > ESFQ for a large NATed LAN - it appears to be OK - but will a netfilter > independent replacement allow this sort of flexability? It probably could, but I don't know how the dummy device receives it's packets, so I don't know if you can make it see the real source IP. Your mail made me realize I need patch for exactly the same issue with ESFQ for work, so if you need it I can send it to you. Regards Patrick > > Andy. >