From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40BF87BB.4020808@246tNt.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:19:07 +0200 From: Sylvain Munaut MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: DMA support for MPC5xxx? References: <20040603090635.B7347@home.com> <20040603164245.B24A9C109F@atlas.denx.de> <20040603113302.A24468@home.com> <20040603185053.GN15195@smtp.west.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20040603185053.GN15195@smtp.west.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: >>> See the thread starting at >>> http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-dev/200311/msg00000.html >>> >>> David even posted on this list to get feedback from the >>> community. But I haven't seen a single reply on the mailing >>> lists. >> >> So? Repost. I miss stuff the first time around a lot of times >> myself [this is not to indicate that I would necessarily comment >> on 5200 stuff, just an example]. > > > And this time do it against 2.6. Even if 2.4 wasn't necessarily > frozen at the time we first tried, it is now. Actually I got some patch to support MPC5200 ( and only this one, no mgt5100 stuff ) for 2.6 It only supports booting, serial console and i2c. Not much but could that be put in official tree if I submit it ? Or does it need to support more than that to worth inclusion. So that at least if someone tries to implement more ( I'll resume my work on it in a few weeks ), it has a base already in official tree. Sylvain Munaut ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/