From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Debreczeni Peter <dante@tvnet.hu>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:37:50 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Linux vs. Windows XP routing latency
Message-Id: <40C0893E.2050903@tvnet.hu>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20040602150137.4746.qmail@hc-online.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <20040602150137.4746.qmail@hc-online.com.ar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org


> From dmesg:
> 
> via-rhine.c:v1.10-LK1.1.17  March-1-2003  Written by Donald Becker
>   http://www.scyld.com/network/via-rhine.html
> eth0: VIA VT6102 Rhine-II at 0xdc00, 00:0a:e6:a1:d9:01, IRQ 5.
> eth0: MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x786d advertising 05e1 Link 45e1.
> eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability of 45e1.
> 
> What is a duplex mismatch?
> 

when two side of a link use different duplex setting
did you tried with another NIC card , via isn`t a fine
chip i think
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/