All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: nardelli <jnardelli@infosciences.com>
To: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Memory leak in visor.c and ftdi_sio.c
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:25:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40C0B082.5020509@infosciences.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9q8a6$hga$1@sea.gmane.org>

Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 04/06/2004 15:59, nardelli wrote:
> 
>> Note that I have not verified any of the below on
>> hardware associated with drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c,
>> only with drivers/usb/serial/visor.c.  If anyone has
>> hardware for this device, I would appreciate your comments.
>>
>> A memory leak occurs in both drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
>> and drivers/usb/serial/visor.c when the usb device is
>> unplugged while data is being written to the device.  This
>> patch should clear that up.
> 
> 
> The change to ftdi_sio.c looks correct to me.
> 
> I made the original change to ftdi_sio.c to allocate the write urbs and 
> their transfer buffers dynamically (instead of using a preallocated 
> pool) and I copied that technique from visor.c!
> 
> A related problem with the current implementation is that is easy to run 
> out of memory by running something similar to this:
> 
>  # cat /dev/zero > /dev/ttyUSB0
> 
> That affects both the ftdi_sio and visor drivers.
> 

I believe that I have seen something similiar, but possibly not identical.
When writing alot (I used /dev/urandom instead of /dev/zero), it looks
like a very large percentage of buffers that are being allocated during
writes are not being freed.  One test I did indicated that 95% of buffers
were not being freed!  I briefly mention some info in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/25/72, but I wasn't going to go into detail
until I'd found out more info, and verified that my test procedure was
adequate.

My test is pretty simple, print out the address every time a buffer is
allocated, and print out the address every time a buffer is freed.  In
this case there is only one location where it is being allocated, but 3
(4 with patch I submitted) where it is being freed.  It's simply a matter
of running a command like the one below, and looking to see which addresses
are in there an odd number of times (i.e. allocated, but not freed).  Not a
perfect test, but hopefully not embarrassingly bad either.

cat /var/log/messages | egrep 'Allocated|Freed' | tr -s ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f 7 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n

I'm not sure why such a high percentage would not be freed, but hopefully I'll
figure it out in the next week or two, time permitting.

-- 
Joe Nardelli
jnardelli@infosciences.com

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-04 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-04 14:59 [PATCH] Memory leak in visor.c and ftdi_sio.c nardelli
2004-06-04 16:34 ` Ian Abbott
2004-06-04 17:25   ` nardelli [this message]
2004-06-04 18:04   ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-06-04 23:16   ` [linux-usb-devel] " Peter Horton
2004-06-05  0:18   ` Greg KH
2004-06-07  9:58     ` Ian Abbott
2004-06-07 14:19     ` nardelli
2004-06-07 15:43       ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-06-07 15:56         ` nardelli
2004-06-04 18:12 ` Greg KH
2004-06-04 18:47   ` nardelli
2004-06-04 22:02     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40C0B082.5020509@infosciences.com \
    --to=jnardelli@infosciences.com \
    --cc=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.