From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40C1C67A.6010908@g-house.de> Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 15:11:22 +0200 From: Christian Kujau MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix typo in binutils version check References: <20040605074341.GA15279@suse.de> <40C1A334.5010402@g-house.de> <20040605111135.GA30640@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20040605111135.GA30640@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Olaf Hering wrote: |>why is this check bogus then? i tried to compile a kernel with some |>recent binutils which didn't pass the test - compilation failed. |>H.J.Lu's binutils [1] are working quite well, the releases from redhat |>[2] seem to produce these results you wrote about. | | | The checkbin target fails with current binutils cvs, you need an | additional option like -many ...or i just stick to the hjl branch and everything works fine :) - -- BOFH excuse #399: We are a 100% Microsoft Shop. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/