From: Feizhou <feizhou@linuxmail.org>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Is this firewall good enough?
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 23:03:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40C5D53A.9060407@linuxmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406081057.40137.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Antony Stone wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 June 2004 10:42 am, Feizhou wrote:
>
>
>>>2. /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state
>>>ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>>
>>Forget about this. It makes things easier yes but it is too slow if you
>>come under attack...but then you put everything on one box seemly so I
>>guess you don't get much traffic.
>
>
> How do you recommend dealing with reply packets instead?
I would create multiple chains
iptables -N tcp_packets and so on.
So to avoid loading the connection tracking module, I would put rules to
handle return packets in the proper chain.
eg: iptables -A tcp_packets -p tcp --sport 1024:65535 --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
Then i put tcp/udp/icmp packets to the proper chain
eg: iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -j tcp_packets
You could make a catch all for return packets like:
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp ! --syn -j ACCEPT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-08 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-08 9:14 Is this firewall good enough? Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-08 9:42 ` Feizhou
2004-06-08 9:57 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-08 15:03 ` Feizhou [this message]
2004-06-08 15:23 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-08 20:11 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 9:48 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-09 10:03 ` Feizhou
2004-06-08 16:17 ` David Cannings
2004-06-08 20:14 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 9:28 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-06-09 9:57 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 11:05 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-06-09 13:18 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 13:23 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 8:36 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-08 9:44 ` Rob Sterenborg
2004-06-09 8:14 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-09 9:56 ` Rob Sterenborg
2004-06-09 15:12 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-06-09 15:15 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-06-11 14:24 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-08 9:55 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-08 12:38 ` Chris Brenton
2004-06-09 7:32 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-09 13:47 ` Chris Brenton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40C5D53A.9060407@linuxmail.org \
--to=feizhou@linuxmail.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.