From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Blandford Subject: Re: [RFC] rpc_ping and looong timeouts Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 10:51:11 -0700 Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Message-ID: <40C5FC8F.5090509@sedona.intel.com> References: <16575.35426.918728.134817@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <16576.51269.311121.121046@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <16576.60526.394177.533027@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <40C4B3FF.3060005@sedona.intel.com> <16580.46990.794712.901678@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <40C5E4A0.10405@sedona.intel.com> <16581.59576.649866.64681@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <16581.63097.282897.254922@segfault.boston.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <16581.63097.282897.254922@segfault.boston.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: jmoyer@redhat.com Cc: autofs@linux.kernel.org, raven@themaw.net Jeff Moyer wrote: >I guess we could come full circle on this issue, and try to solve it at the >rpc layer. > I like this solution. It removes the dependency on icmp. Michael Disclaimer: The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.