From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <40C99182.8050201@intracom.gr> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:03:30 +0300 From: Pantelis Antoniou MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse Cc: Meriin Michael-BMM063 , "'Ricardo DIz'" , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: U-Boot and kernel 2.6 References: <0F48024310E5D6118D200002B3A440DB08B07A3D@zil01exm08.mcil.comm.mot.com> <1086950206.15845.1268.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1086950206.15845.1268.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: David Woodhouse wrote: >On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 09:45 +0300, Meriin Michael-BMM063 wrote: > >>Check the bd_t definition, it MUST be the same in u-boot and Linux platform definition. >>bd_t in Linux is defined in ppcboot.h >> > >We really need to throw this crap away and start using structured tags >like ARM does. > >-- >dwmw2 > > > > > > Or we can parse the u-boot environment which is ascii. I already do this... Regards Pantelis ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/