From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5EBoe030345 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:50:40 -0400 Received: from ciistr2.ist.utl.pt (ciistr2.ist.utl.pt [193.136.128.2]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5EBoci5030337 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:50:39 -0400 Received: from ciistr3.ist.utl.pt (ciistr3.ist.utl.pt [193.136.128.3]) by ciistr2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31E27E315 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:50:37 +0100 (WEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ciistr3.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA39E3308CD for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:50:37 +0100 (WEST) Received: from ciistr3.ist.utl.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ciistr3 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12099-07 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:50:37 +0100 (WEST) Received: from mail.ist.utl.pt (mail.ist.utl.pt [193.136.128.8]) by ciistr3.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752B4330626 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:50:37 +0100 (WEST) Message-ID: <40CD910A.9040605@ist.utl.pt> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:50:34 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Cabe=E7a?=" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 seems to chop performance by 33% References: <40C86F52.4090500@dgreaves.com> In-Reply-To: <40C86F52.4090500@dgreaves.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Hi, > I didn't think lvm2 had such a big performance hit? > > 65Mb/s on the raid5 device > 44Mb/s on the lv > Did you try to ajust the read ahead with blockdev on the LV itself? # blockdev --setra XXXX /dev/sda (raid5 device, just for comparisson) # blockdev --setra XXXX /dev/vg/lv (lv) Try some values for the readahead. On my system I use 2048. Best regards Miguel Cabe=EF=BF=BDa