From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Kernel Oops with kernel 2.4.25 and iptables 1.2.9 in __unexpect_related Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:06:13 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40CF3A95.7060302@trash.net> References: <002401c452ac$06523580$7c01a8c0@std.visionutv.se> <40CEB3DA.5070401@trash.net> <004d01c45300$768a0a40$7c01a8c0@std.visionutv.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Peter Olsson In-Reply-To: <004d01c45300$768a0a40$7c01a8c0@std.visionutv.se> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Peter Olsson wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > I meant kernel 2.4.17, not 2.4.27 :) > > About other patches... I've applied a couple of other patch-o-matic patches, > but pptp_conntrack_nat > is the only one that seem to call anything related to the __unexpect_related > function. I've only applied > patches that were tested ok, not the experimental ones. The > "__unexpect_related" has the following > code in my version of ip_conntrack_core.c. Well, there is at least one that won't work with pptp_conntrack_nat (expect-optimize), so it would really help to see a list. When did you patch your kernel with pom (roughly) ? You also didn't mention which kernel version you ran when it crashed. Regards Patrick