From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ed Wildgoose Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:38:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] QOS Script difficulty on bridge Message-Id: <40D20153.4000204@wildgooses.com> List-Id: References: <40D06CEF.3000005@wildgooses.com> In-Reply-To: <40D06CEF.3000005@wildgooses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Jason Boxman wrote: >On Thursday 17 June 2004 03:29, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > > > >>Consider: >> >>Internet -> Router -> Eth1 -> br0 -> Eth0 -> local net >> >>Now by applying QOS to eth1 I control outgoing traffic from everywhere. >>By applying QOS to eth0 I control incoming to the localnet (great), but >>NOT to the local bridge machine >> >>Now I could fix this by using the IMQ device on eth1 and grabbing >>incoming traffic, but the top of the file at >>http://digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ implies that it is possible to do >>this without IMQ... >> >>The question is how? I don't see how to do it.... What am I missing? >> >> > >It's my understanding that you cannot attach much of anything except the >police filter on the ingress hook. As such, you need IMQ to attach egress >qdiscs to for application to incoming traffic, as you would to the root hook >for egress traffic. > >http://www.docum.org/docum.org/kptd/ > > Sure, that's my understanding as well, but see the comments at the top of the script, and also the way the script carefully checks for a bridge connection and avoids using the IMQ device... Perhaps it's just a mistaken comment, but it implies that he thinks it's possible to avoid using the IMQ device... I can't see how though (I did drop him an email, but no answer so far) THanks for any ideas on this conundrum Ed W _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/