From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
To: Nick Bartos <spam99@2thebatcave.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: ext3 -> reiserfs conversion utility?
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:00:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40D3BA63.70307@slaphack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57818.192.168.1.12.1087599726.squirrel@192.168.1.12>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nick Bartos wrote:
<snip>
| From what I am reading, everyone just backs up their files and then
| reformats & restores the files.
For any two filesystems, it's highly unlikely that you can just convert
between the two. I mean, theoretically yes, practically? There's not
even funding (I think) for a reiser 3-4 conversion.
| Is there any other way? I have too many and it would be a huge pain to do
| that will all of them.
Do backups. Now. You are an idiot and/or a cheapskate if you don't
have backups, because one day something will happen -- probably
something ridiculously stupid -- and you will need them. I mean, go
build a backup server and, if you can afford it, give it something like
a terabyte raid5 hotplug array. Do it now.
If you are backing up, I hope I haven't offended you. In such a case,
it's highly likely that you can restore your backup even using something
like Knoppix. If you can't, go rethink how you're doing your backups.
In fact, I suggest you fit each of them with cd drives or floppy drives
(cheap ones are fine) and make a custom boot cd or floppy that restores
the backup on boot. This simplifies the process of changing
filesystems, and also means you can be back up and running in a hurry.
How similar are these boxes, btw? I bet you can make them all use the
same cd for restoring a backup (getting the id of the machine from its
mac address). For that matter, you might even set up a net boot server
- -- this makes things simpler, as a change to the backup process couldn't
possibly require burning a bunch of new cds.
With such a system in place, total time to change filesystems is --
install reiserfsprogs, a reiser-enabled kernel, and slight config
changes on the net boot server, then go around and reboot each computer,
manually specifying a net boot. Or have a net boot floppy, and put a
copy in each computer -- leave it sticking out of the drive when you
don't need it, push it in and reboot for new fs. Then sit back and wait.
Now, it will still be a huge pain, but probably worth it. Reiserfs
always seemed a lot faster than ext3 to me. Reiser4 seems just as much
faster than v3. And full backup + speedy recovery = good always.
This is sent to the list as generic advice for anyone with multiple boxes.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=AntR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-19 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-18 23:02 ext3 -> reiserfs conversion utility? Nick Bartos
2004-06-19 0:44 ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-19 4:00 ` David Masover [this message]
2004-06-19 4:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-06-19 7:25 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40D3BA63.70307@slaphack.com \
--to=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=spam99@2thebatcave.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.