From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas S. Wourms" Subject: Re: Reiser4's status of this week. Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 14:15:39 -0400 Message-ID: <40D482CB.1080303@netscape.net> References: <7794555.1087651158684.JavaMail.postfix@mx20.mail.sohu.com> <40D45B6C.7000002@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <40D45B6C.7000002@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Hans Reiser Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hans Reiser wrote: > stone_wang@sohu.com wrote: > >> Hi,Hans: >> >> Your website are saying "Reiser4 is in final testing, and will ship >> soon!" It has been saying that for a long time :( >> >> >> When could Reiser4 be finaly released? We are eager to try it. >> >> Regards. >> >> Stone. >> >> >> >> > next week. or so we hope. Hans, I've noticed that there seems to be a problem with your reiser4-linux-2.6 bitkeeper repository. Unlike the 2.5 version I used awhile back, this one seems to just be an old copy of the stock linux-2.6.5 kernel with the 2.6.5-mm2 patches added. None of the reiser4 base or extra patches seem to have been added (excluding the ones for fs/reiser4). Would someone mind fixing this? Don't you have an internal repository with all the modifications in the base and extra series applied? If your internal tree can't be exported, can you provide a snapshot BK-style(not gnu) patch against linus-current? I've also noticed, as has been noted in the past, that bk pulls are still broken. Someone mentioned that it is a problem with the new bk. If this is true, why not contact Larry for support? Not that it matters now, since the reiser4-linux-2.6 isn't usable, but it might be helpful for future syncs. Cheers, Nicholas