From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Reiser4's status of this week. Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:49:37 -0700 Message-ID: <40D4C301.1090406@namesys.com> References: <7794555.1087651158684.JavaMail.postfix@mx20.mail.sohu.com> <40D45B6C.7000002@namesys.com> <40D482CB.1080303@netscape.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <40D482CB.1080303@netscape.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Nicholas S. Wourms" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX , Vladimir Saveliev Nicholas S. Wourms wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > >> stone_wang@sohu.com wrote: >> >>> Hi,Hans: >>> >>> Your website are saying "Reiser4 is in final testing, and will ship >>> soon!" It has been saying that for a long time :( >>> >>> >>> When could Reiser4 be finaly released? We are eager to try it. >>> >>> Regards. >>> >>> Stone. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> next week. or so we hope. > > > Hans, > > I've noticed that there seems to be a problem with your > reiser4-linux-2.6 bitkeeper repository. Unlike the 2.5 version I used > awhile back, this one seems to just be an old copy of the stock > linux-2.6.5 kernel with the 2.6.5-mm2 patches added. None of the > reiser4 base or extra patches seem to have been added (excluding the > ones for fs/reiser4). Would someone mind fixing this? Don't you have > an internal repository with all the modifications in the base and > extra series applied? If your internal tree can't be exported, can > you provide a snapshot BK-style(not gnu) patch against linus-current? > > I've also noticed, as has been noted in the past, that bk pulls are > still broken. Someone mentioned that it is a problem with the new bk. > If this is true, why not contact Larry for support? Not that it > matters now, since the reiser4-linux-2.6 isn't usable, but it might be > helpful for future syncs. > > Cheers, > Nicholas > > > this is for flx and vs to answer....