From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ed Wildgoose Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 17:10:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users Message-Id: <40D5C50D.7090600@wildgooses.com> List-Id: References: <40D2D5CB.2000804@wildgooses.com> In-Reply-To: <40D2D5CB.2000804@wildgooses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > After further investigation I think you need the patch a little more > like this for PPPoE and the params you gave (Andy do you think this > looks OK?) Please let me know if this works for you. Duh, scratch that. I think the original patch will work for PPPoE (give or take). Can someone help work out how the heck you calculate the real usage of a packet over PPPoE? Reading a bit further I get the impression that you have an 8 byte overhead for PPPoE, then it still travels down an ATM circuit (just like PPPoA)? Can anyone confirm or deny? I have seen some reports that you actually have two ethernet frames wrapped inside each other (which is very inefficient), but I can't see which is right? If it's the former, then I think the original patch will work well enough for PPPoE people, it's 2 bytes out, but that shouldn't really show up. Can someone please try and report back Thanks Ed W _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/