From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6 1/14]: Fix non-existant config option CONFIG_NF_DEBUG Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 01:20:01 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40D76D21.90000@trash.net> References: <20040621193851.GF24374@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20040621144452.15fbe009.davem@redhat.com> <20040621224456.GJ24374@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <20040621160138.2738c8e1.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20040621160138.2738c8e1.davem@redhat.com> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org David S. Miller wrote: > The person who codes the patch (in this case Patrick), the person > who first integrates it (you) and me all have to sign off on the > patch. > > I don't care if you use bitkeeper or not, but you have to give me > the Signed-off-by: lines in your email descriptions or someplace > similar. In this case Harald just passed the patchset on, so all mistakes are mine. The 2.4 patches didn't include any Signed-off-by: lines because I was under the impression that Marcelo doesn't require them. All 2.6 patches had them at the end of the patch description, but I'll be happy to include them directly in the changeset comments next time I prepare a patchset. Regards Patrick