From: Steve French <smfrench@austin.rr.com>
To: linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Process hangs copying large file to cifs
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:16:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40DA47A7.6030300@austin.rr.com> (raw)
> This is copying a 197Mb from an my laptop's IDE hardisk to a cifs
mounted share that's on a Win2000 Server
This seems strange - looks like cifs simply called generic_write which
goes to the page manager which in this case had to
rebalance/free up some pages which hung in local filesys routine outside
of my code which I do not recognize.
[<c028dae0>] schedule_timeout+0x60/0xc0
[<c0131541>] __alloc_pages+0x2c1/0x300
[<c011eb00>] process_timeout+0x0/0x10
[<c028da3e>] io_schedule_timeout+0xe/0x50
[<c01ebe02>] blk_congestion_wait+0x72/0x90
[<c0116470>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[<c0116470>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
[<c0132212>] get_dirty_limits+0x12/0xd0
[<c013238d>] balance_dirty_pages+0xbd/0x110
[<c012f5ad>] generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x3ed/0x980
[<c012e2d0>] file_read_actor+0xc0/0xd0
[<c012e477>] __generic_file_aio_read+0x197/0x1d0
[<c012e210>] file_read_actor+0x0/0xd0
[<c012fb9f>] generic_file_write_nolock+0x5f/0x80
[<c014623f>] do_sync_read+0x6f/0xb0
[<c01060a3>] do_IRQ+0x113/0x150
[<c012fc8e>] generic_file_write+0x3e/0x60
[<de9c05bc>] cifs_write_wrapper+0x4c/0xb0 [cifs]
As you mentioned the vi thread is another one of the threads blocked in
the local call "blk_congestion_wait" which may be useful to understand.
I don't see any interesting threads in cifs at first glance, although
the call stack for the cifsoplock thread is a little odd looking (perhaps
some junk being misinterpreted on the call stack).
Could you take a look at the /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData, which (at least
on current 2.6.7) displays some often useful debug data
including the lists of "MIDs" (multiplex ids - pending network
operations on the wire) if any and also /proc/fs/cifs/Stats and
SimultaneousOps
which display counts of number of operations pending in the vfs which
looks like only one - in this case - which is blocked outside the cifs code.
My guess is that there actually aren't any interesting threads in cifs
at the moment, and that we need to understand the
blk_congestion_wait calls are trying to do
next reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 3:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-24 3:16 Steve French [this message]
2004-06-24 10:48 ` Process hangs copying large file to cifs Nuno Ferreira
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-28 21:58 Steve French
2004-06-29 11:12 ` Nuno Ferreira
2004-08-12 16:31 ` Nuno Ferreira
2004-08-12 16:31 ` Nuno Ferreira
2004-08-13 6:34 ` Steve French (IBM LTC)
2004-08-12 20:06 ` Nuno Ferreira
2004-08-13 16:21 ` Nuno Ferreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40DA47A7.6030300@austin.rr.com \
--to=smfrench@austin.rr.com \
--cc=linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.