From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:11:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40DFC48A.90203@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040627181831.GI21651@pengutronix.de>
Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:25:40PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
>
>>how will we call the Motorola i.MX processors in future?
>>
>>Will it be "imx", "i.MX", "iMX" or MC9328MX{1,21,L}?
>
> The original 2.4 Linux port was mx1ads which is definitely wrong: it is
> the name of the Motorola development board. Following the scheme of the
> other architectures and platforms I would vote for imx.
Following the scheme of the other architectures and platforms _and_ speaking
as a hardware developer I would vote for MC9328MX...
Or at least "iMX".
>>Should we call the eval board "mx1ads" oder "M93281ADS" as Motorola does
>>and as it is printed on it?
>
>
> mx1ads would be fine for me.
(see above) M93281ADS.
Anyone else? ;-)
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-28 7:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-27 11:25 [U-Boot-Users] nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ? Steven Scholz
2004-06-27 18:18 ` [U-Boot-Users] " Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 7:11 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2004-06-28 7:19 ` llandre
2004-06-28 9:20 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 9:31 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 9:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 10:51 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 11:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 12:38 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 14:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-06-28 14:17 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 12:14 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 13:01 ` Robert Schwebel
2004-06-28 15:15 ` Sascha Hauer
2004-06-28 9:57 ` llandre
2004-06-28 10:09 ` Steven Scholz
2004-06-28 11:07 ` llandre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40DFC48A.90203@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.