From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 18:49:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40DFDBB2.7010800@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088412045.1694.3.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com>
Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> I have tested 2.6.7-bk10 plus from_2.6.7_to_staircase_7.7 patch and,
> while it's definitively better than previous versions, it still feels a
> little jerky when moving windows in X11 wrt to -mm3. Renicing makes it a
> little bit smoother, but not as much as -mm3 without renicing.
>
You know, if renicing X makes it smoother, then that is a good thing
IMO. X needs large amounts of CPU and low latency in order to get
good interactivity, which is something the scheduler shouldn't give
to a process unless it is told to.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-28 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-25 16:40 [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4 Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:44 ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-25 19:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-25 19:48 ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 1:11 ` kernel
2004-06-26 16:33 ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 17:29 ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 9:14 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 19:17 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-27 19:28 ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 21:55 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28 0:15 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 8:40 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28 8:49 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-06-28 11:53 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-28 12:11 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:03 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 15:19 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-28 15:39 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2004-06-28 17:11 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-06-29 4:36 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-28 23:21 ` Peter Williams
2004-06-29 4:44 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-29 6:01 ` Ed Sweetman
2004-06-29 6:55 ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-26 2:05 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:24 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 10:27 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 23:50 ` Peter Williams
2004-06-27 12:00 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:04 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 12:54 ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-27 13:15 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 16:46 ` Michael Buesch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-25 14:38 Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 18:32 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-06-26 1:28 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-25 22:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-06-26 1:05 ` kernel
2004-06-26 20:04 ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 20:11 ` Michael Buesch
2004-06-26 21:14 ` Wes Janzen
2004-06-26 21:38 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-06-27 9:16 ` Con Kolivas
2004-06-27 11:40 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40DFDBB2.7010800@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
--cc=willy@w.ods.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.