From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Feizhou Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:05:36 +0800 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40E17730.6010305@linuxmail.org> References: <1B5A52EE434FEB48AA4803AD84BD3FC37945@goliath.tngnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1B5A52EE434FEB48AA4803AD84BD3FC37945@goliath.tngnet.net> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Richard Gutery Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Richard Gutery wrote: > Stop macro: > $IPT -N LD > $IPT -A LD -j LOG > $IPT -A LD -j DROP > > $STOP=LD (LD = Log and Drop) > > $IPT = /sbin/iptables > > I need to totally block all packets to and from this address 64.246.26.185. So BLOCK means BLOCK. > > We OpenBSD users usually mean blocking as dropping the silly thing on the floor. No ifs, ands or buts. Just gone... > > As for the limiting, I simply copied a rule that was already in a firestarter script. So if I need to change the rule, I would be more than willing. Am I to assume that this is a bad rule? > You want to totally block but you also want to log and limitly at that?