All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dieter Stueken <stueken@conterra.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Partition or whole disk ?
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:40:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40E2ED12.9020703@conterra.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088604941.2840.1.camel@JubJub>

Josh Litherland wrote:
> Couldn't find an authoritative answer to this in the faq or elsewhere...
> Is it preferred to build md sets out of whole disks or of partitions ? 
> Is there any functional reason why either one is better ?

If you make partitions, about one track is is "wasted" to store
the useless partition table. Thus I used whole disks for a long time.

The problem might be, that "fdisk -l" won't show up if this
disk is an MD device. It shows an empty partition table which
may look like an unused/empty disk. If you create the partition
table, you may waste some data, but fdisk may show this is a
disk with a partition containing some MD data on it.

Meanwhile I turned back to make partition tables again,
just to "tag" the disk as "in use". If I put a new disk
into my system, it has no partition table. Thus I can verify
this condition, before I initialize the disk. This may prevent
me from accidentally initialize/destroying some disk in use,
which already has an partition table.

Dieter.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-06-30 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-30 14:15 Partition or whole disk ? Josh Litherland
2004-06-30 14:55 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-06-30  8:09   ` Ryan B. Lynch
2004-06-30 16:11   ` Guy
2004-06-30 16:40 ` Dieter Stueken [this message]
2004-07-01 17:15 ` Mark Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40E2ED12.9020703@conterra.de \
    --to=stueken@conterra.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.