From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ed Wildgoose Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 15:51:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb: class 10007 isn't work conserving ?! Message-Id: <40E978E7.6030908@wildgooses.com> List-Id: References: <20040702145856.GE630@mabeys.dsl.aros.net> In-Reply-To: <20040702145856.GE630@mabeys.dsl.aros.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org >Our ISP has given us 5 static IP address plus one router IP address and I >was wondering if I could get rid of their stupid EN5861 router and set up >the linux machine to handle all the static addresses and routing. I figured >I'd have to set up alises for other IP addresses eg ifconfig eth0:0 >xx.xx.xx.193 but once I've done that I've found out I cant use ip route to >configure it eg ip route add default dev eth0:0 table server. Whats the >best way to go about this? > >Cheers. > >By the way I'm running redhat 9 with two adsl connections, on is a >speedtouch USB modem and the other is the EN5861 router. > > I'm not quite sure why you tagged this on to the end of a thread about htb classes? As a result many people may not even read your question...? I have one of those EN5861 router things, and actually I find it pretty good. The biggest issue is that it's a bit of a timebomb, the powersupply dies after a few years, and unless you have a spare it's a bit of a weak link Do you need to do some particularly advanced routing that's stopping you just using the en5861? Good luck Ed W _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/