From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 12:24:20 -0700
Message-ID: <40E9AAE4.1020101@namesys.com>
References: <1089029792.7071.52.camel@localhost> <20040705123032.GY4990@nysv.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-19516-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20040705123032.GY4990@nysv.org>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_T=F6rnqvist?= <mjt@nysv.org>
Cc: Mikael Cluseau <nwrk@nwrk.dyndns.org>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Markus T=F6rnqvist wrote:

>On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:17:20PM +0200, Mikael Cluseau wrote:
> =20
>
>>Is there a patch the *vanilla* Linux 2.6.7 kernel ?
>>   =20
>>
>
>Afaik no.
>
>Last time something like this was tried, it resulted in random
>freezings, and there I was not the only one affected.
>Although it was an old snapshot.
>
>The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
>that's what the Reiser4 people are trying to accomplish...
>
>There's nothing wrong with sticking to what Namesys gives :)
>
> =20
>
After we send to -mm we will work on a mainline patch.

Unfortunately I have to tell you that we are doing contract work for a=20
customer not related to reiser4 in order to pay the bills, and for that=20
reason reiser4 will most likely not get debugged this week.

Hans