From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BhclR-0003lV-Ai for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:20:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BhclP-0003kz-J6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:20:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BhclP-0003kn-GA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:20:43 -0400 Received: from [64.12.137.4] (helo=imo-m23.mx.aol.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BhcjH-0003Si-DQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 19:18:31 -0400 Received: from FredAkbar@aol.com by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r2.6.) id 4.19a.2691e88c (15886) for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:18:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 16:18:23 -0700 (PDT) From: "Fred Hope" Message-ID: <40E9E1BF.9000407@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/HTML; CHARSET=us-ascii Subject: [Qemu-devel] re: Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org From what I've seen (I've run the text-only linux that comes on the linux-test img, as well as Windows 98 and the Red Hat 9 installer), it's somewhat slower than VPC (OS 10.3.4, VPC 6.1.1 or so). Hopefully the speed will improve over time as Qemu is improved and optimized.

Fred Hope