From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Correa Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 19:43:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Simply IMQ Message-Id: <40EB00F3.905@pobox.com> List-Id: References: <003a01c4635f$f4cc9e30$0201a8c0@jabbacom.net> In-Reply-To: <003a01c4635f$f4cc9e30$0201a8c0@jabbacom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Walt, I cannot tell you about Fedora, I'm not a user of it. I would suggest you ask it on IMQ mailling list. Maybe there is somebody using Fedora there who can help. If you find nothing please send me in pvt exactly what were your steps and the error messages you got on the way. Andre Walt Wyndroski wrote: > Actually, I do have a question concerning fedora core 2, iptables-1.2.9 and > above, and IMQ. The problem is as follows: > > I easily got IMQ compiled into the 2.6.6 kernel on FC2. I'm using > iptables-1.2.9. I could not get iptables-1.2.9 to recompile. I kept getting > errors about using glibc headers instead. I found a patch for iptables > Makefile which fixed that. However, the shared library (libipt_IMQ.so) would > never get created. > > Is something wrong with the kernel headers from the Fedora kernel-sourcecode > rpm? > > I realize that this is not entirely related to the LARTC list. > > Regards, > > Walt Wyndroski > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andre Correa" > To: "Walt Wyndroski" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:07 PM > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Simply IMQ > > > >>Hi Walt, I'm the "Correa" from your list. In fact www.linuximq.net is a >>project from a group of people, not just me, who are working on: >>Devera->McHardy IMQ's code that was unmantained and now is alive again. >> >>We can tell you that there is a lot of people in our mailling list who >>reports using IMQ in production, including myself, with great stability. >>My server is up for more then 160 days with around 100 PPPoE users on it >>all the time. I run it on other shapping servers as well. >> >>We've eing working on IMQ last months and now there are stable versions >>for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels (up to 2.6.7), and one beta version being >>tested. In your scenario you better get the stable versions: >> >>Patch for Linux-2.6.1 up to 2.6.7 - >>http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.6.2-imq-4.diff >> >>Patch for Linux-2.4.24 / 2.4.25 / 2.4.26 - >>http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/linux-2.4.26-imq.diff >> >>Patch for iptables up to 1.2.11 - >>http://www.linuximq.net/patchs/iptables-1.2.9-imq1.diff >> >>I don't know if someone used IMQ in a 27Mbps link but it is worth >>trying. I would like to invite you to visit our site at www.linuximq.net >>and join our low traffic mailling list. >> >>If you ever decide to give our beta patch a try, it has some corrections >>and implementations as follows: >> >>- Correction of ipv6 support "+"s issue (Hasso Tepper) >>- Correction of imq_init_devs() issue that resulted in >>kernel OOPS unloading IMQ as module (Norbert Buchmuller) >>- Addition of functionality to choose number of IMQ devices >>during kernel config (Andre Correa) >>- Addition of functionality to choose how IMQ hooks on >>PRE and POSTROUTING (after or before NAT) (Andre Correa) >>- Cosmetic corrections (Norbert Buchmuller) (Andre Correa) >> >> >>Please let us know if we can help you somehow. >> >>Good Luck! >> >>Andre >> >> >> >>Walt Wyndroski wrote: >> >>>I've followed this list for quite a long time and have even posted a > > couple > >>>of times. I used the early versions of IMQ from Devik (I think that was > > his > >>>name), and it worked well. I only ever got the chance to implement it in > > my > >>>test environment. I now need to implement it in my production > > environment. > >>>My Linux core router has nine interfaces and has a 27 megabit connection > > to > >>>the internet. It is quite busy much of the time. It runs Fedora Core 1 > > now > >>>but will most likely be upgraded to Fedora Core 2 in the next month or > > so. > >>>Now with all that said, here is my question. I see that maintenance of > > IMQ > >>>has been passed on a couple of times. I see some people say that IMQ is > > not > >>>stable and should not be put into a production environment. My use of > > IMQ a > >>>year ago invovled only egress qdiscs using HTB and SFQ because the > > egress > >>>qdiscs were much more powerful and better than the ingress qdisc. The > > only > >>>problem that I ever had with IMQ was using the iptables target with both >>>PREROUTING and POSTROUTING. I see Roy has posted that IMQ essentially >>>crashes when doing egress shaping. Is this correct? I've always > > understood > >>>egress as outbound shaping/filtering and ingress as inbound >>>shaping/filtering. I say that because I saw in an earlier post by Roy > > that > >>>he changed his terminology to INPUT,OUTPUT, and FORWARD. Was he not > > using > >>>the terms egress and ingress correctly? I see that the current 'big' > > problem > >>>is touching locally generated traffic. What I need to know is which > > version > >>>of IMQ is most stable for kernel 2.6? Or even kernel2.4? Is it Devera's? >>>McHardy's? Correa's? or Roy's? Or should I just leave it alone? My > > apologies > >>>if I got names wrong. >>> >>>This is probably a long email just to ask that question, but I can't > > seem to > >>>find an answer from the list archives. I downloaded the whole 46 mb > > archive > >>>and essentially read 90% of the posts related to IMQ. I'm just trying to > > get > >>>a good understanding of what's happening with/to IMQ. >>> >>>Thank you in advance for any advice. >>> >>>Walt Wyndroski >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >>>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl >>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/