Con Kolivas wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> * Con Kolivas wrote: >> >> >>> Ooops forgot to mention this was running reiserFS 3.6 on software >>> raid0 2x IDE with cfq elevator. >> >> >> >> ok, reiserfs (and all journalling fs's) definitely need a look - as you >> can see from the ext3 mods in the patch. Any chance you could try ext3 >> based tests? Those are the closest to my setups. >> > > Ok I've done one better than that ;) I had wli help make some > instrumentation for me to help find the remaining non preemptible kernel > portions and set the cutoff to 2ms. Here is what I found: > > 7ms non-preemptible critical section violated 2 ms preempt threshold > starting at reiserfs_sync_fs+0x2d/0xc2 and ending at reiser > fs_lookup+0xe2/0x221 > > 9ms non-preemptible critical section violated 2 ms preempt threshold > starting at reiserfs_dirty_inode+0x37/0x10e and ending at r > eiserfs_dirty_inode+0xb0/0x10e > > > These seem to be the two offenders. Hope this helps. Oh and here are two different ones: 5ms non-preemptible critical section violated 2 ms preempt threshold starting at add_wait_queue+0x21/0x82 and ending at add_wait _queue+0x4a/0x82 3ms non-preemptible critical section violated 2 ms preempt threshold starting at exit_mmap+0x1c/0x188 and ending at exit_mmap+0x 118/0x188 Con