From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266701AbUGLDUn (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:20:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266697AbUGLDUn (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:20:43 -0400 Received: from pxy1allmi.all.mi.charter.com ([24.247.15.38]:5808 "EHLO proxy1.gha.chartermi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266701AbUGLDUk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:20:40 -0400 Message-ID: <40F20372.9000205@quark.didntduck.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:20:18 -0400 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Juhl CC: Linux-Kernel mailing list , Grzegorz Kulewski , Con Kolivas , Matthias Andree Subject: Re: post 2.6.7 BK change breaks Java? References: <40EEB1B2.7000800@kolivas.org> <8A43C34093B3D5119F7D0004AC56F4BC082C7F9D@difpst1a.dif.dk> In-Reply-To: <8A43C34093B3D5119F7D0004AC56F4BC082C7F9D@difpst1a.dif.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Charter-Information: X-Charter-Scan: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jesper Juhl wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > >>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: >> >> >>>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Con Kolivas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>but I suspect it's one of those possibly interfering. Looking at the >>>>>>patches in question I have no idea how they could do it. I guess if you >>>>>>can try backing them out it would be helpful. Here are links to the >>>>>>patches in question. >>>>>>http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1100_ip_tabl >>>>>>es.patch >>>>>>http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1105_CAN-200 >>>>>>4-0497.patch >>>>>>http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1110_proc.pa >>>>>>tch >>>>> >>>>>Thanks Con, I'll try playing with those tomorrow (got no time tonight), >>>>>and report back. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Ok, got them all 3 backed out of 2.6.7-mm7 , but that doesn't change a >>>>thing. The JVM still dies when I try to run eclipse. >>> >>>I can run Eclipse without any problems on 2.6.7-bk20-ck5 + few other not >>>related patches. Maybe try using non -mm? Try 2.6.7-bk20 and then try >>>reverting some patches. Maybe there is some other problem in -mm that >>>gives similar results? >>> >> >>with plain 2.6.7-bk20 I see the issue, same with 2.6.7-mm7. Reverting >>http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@1.1743 from -mm7 fixes the >>issue. I'm currently building 2.6.7-bk20 minus that cset and I'll report >>back on the results of that in a few minutes. >> > > 2.6.7-bk20 minus the cset works. > > Testing with 2.6.8-rc1 and backing out one or both of the changes in the > cset I get these results : > 2.6.8-rc1 - vanilla - breaks Java > 2.6.8-rc1-jju1 - both changes backed out - works > 2.6.8-rc1-jju2 - only first change (sys_rt_sigsuspend) applied - works > 2.6.8-rc1-jju3 - only second change (sys_sigaltstack) applied - breaks Java > > -- > Jesper Juhl Looks like a GCC (gcc version 3.4.1 20040702 (Red Hat Linux 3.4.1-2)) screwup: sys_sigaltstack: movl 4(%esp), %eax movl 8(%esp), %edx movl 56(%esp), %ecx jmp do_sigaltstack The offsets should be 4 more, to account for the return address on the stack. -- Brian Gerst