From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266705AbUGLD5n (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:57:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266706AbUGLD5n (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:57:43 -0400 Received: from pxy6allmi.all.mi.charter.com ([24.247.15.57]:41856 "EHLO proxy6-grandhaven.chartermi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266705AbUGLD5j (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:57:39 -0400 Message-ID: <40F20C23.9050705@quark.didntduck.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:57:23 -0400 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040625 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Juhl CC: Linux-Kernel mailing list , Grzegorz Kulewski , Con Kolivas , Matthias Andree Subject: Re: post 2.6.7 BK change breaks Java? References: <40EEB1B2.7000800@kolivas.org> <8A43C34093B3D5119F7D0004AC56F4BC082C7F9D@difpst1a.dif.dk> <40F20372.9000205@quark.didntduck.org> In-Reply-To: <40F20372.9000205@quark.didntduck.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Charter-Information: X-Charter-Scan: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Brian Gerst wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > >> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: >> >> >>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Con Kolivas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> but I suspect it's one of those possibly interfering. Looking at the >>>>>>> patches in question I have no idea how they could do it. I guess >>>>>>> if you >>>>>>> can try backing them out it would be helpful. Here are links to the >>>>>>> patches in question. >>>>>>> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1100_ip_tabl >>>>>>> >>>>>>> es.patch >>>>>>> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1105_CAN-200 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 4-0497.patch >>>>>>> http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7/2.6.7-ck5/split-out/1110_proc.pa >>>>>>> >>>>>>> tch >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Con, I'll try playing with those tomorrow (got no time >>>>>> tonight), >>>>>> and report back. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ok, got them all 3 backed out of 2.6.7-mm7 , but that doesn't change a >>>>> thing. The JVM still dies when I try to run eclipse. >>>> >>>> >>>> I can run Eclipse without any problems on 2.6.7-bk20-ck5 + few other >>>> not >>>> related patches. Maybe try using non -mm? Try 2.6.7-bk20 and then try >>>> reverting some patches. Maybe there is some other problem in -mm that >>>> gives similar results? >>>> >>> >>> with plain 2.6.7-bk20 I see the issue, same with 2.6.7-mm7. Reverting >>> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@1.1743 from -mm7 fixes the >>> issue. I'm currently building 2.6.7-bk20 minus that cset and I'll report >>> back on the results of that in a few minutes. >>> >> >> 2.6.7-bk20 minus the cset works. >> >> Testing with 2.6.8-rc1 and backing out one or both of the changes in the >> cset I get these results : >> 2.6.8-rc1 - vanilla - >> breaks Java >> 2.6.8-rc1-jju1 - both changes backed out - works >> 2.6.8-rc1-jju2 - only first change (sys_rt_sigsuspend) applied - works >> 2.6.8-rc1-jju3 - only second change (sys_sigaltstack) applied - >> breaks Java >> >> -- >> Jesper Juhl > > > Looks like a GCC (gcc version 3.4.1 20040702 (Red Hat Linux 3.4.1-2)) > screwup: > > sys_sigaltstack: > movl 4(%esp), %eax > movl 8(%esp), %edx > movl 56(%esp), %ecx > jmp do_sigaltstack > > The offsets should be 4 more, to account for the return address on the > stack. Nevermind, I should have looked more carefully. The offsets are fine in my example. What version of GCC are you using? -- Brian Gerst