From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266806AbUGLMHp (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:07:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266815AbUGLMHp (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:07:45 -0400 Received: from node-209-133-23-217.caravan.ru ([217.23.133.209]:28934 "EHLO mail.tv-sign.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266806AbUGLMHn (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:07:43 -0400 Message-ID: <40F27FE6.A7E4FD96@tv-sign.ru> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:11:18 +0400 From: Oleg Nesterov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: William Lee Irwin III CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , David Gibson Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs private mappings. References: <40F139BA.F1F10B22@tv-sign.ru> <20040712001502.GS21066@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 04:59:38PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Hugetlbfs silently coerce private mappings of hugetlb files > > into shared ones. So private writable mapping has MAP_SHARED > > semantics. I think, such mappings should be disallowed. > > This probably doesn't break anything worth caring about, but it may > make people happier to just force MAP_SHARED on. Yes, it was my initial intent. Andrew Morton pointed out, that this could break existing applications. Oleg.