All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Jonas <mark.jonas@freescale.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: AW: [U-Boot-Users] LITE5200 board: Bus Fault with 2 network cards
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:47:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F3939C.2080300@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE2CC66C40EAB74EA6D66AC71BF98E1E016AF3C4@TQ-MAILSRV-1>

Martin Krause wrote:

>>Is there a known issue with the PCI on the MPC5200, and more specifically
>>with PCI network cards ?
>>    
>>
>
>I also have problems with some PCI cards. Some are recognized, some not. I haven't found an explanation, yet. I guess it has something to do with some "3.3 V compatible" cards are not really compatible with 3.3 V only systems. It could as well be an errata in the MPC5200 described in the MPC5200 Errata Listing: 
>
>ID 322: Violation of PCI Tval min time
>
>The PCI Timing Speci?cation de?nes the timing parameter Tval (CLK to Signal Valid Delay):
>  Tval min 2 ns, max 11 ns (33MHz)
>  Tval min 2 ns, max 6 ns (66MHz)
>  When M66EN is asserted, the minimum speci?cation for Tval(min) may be reduced to 1 ns if a mechanism is provided to guarantee a minimum value of 2 ns when M66EN is deasserted.
>MPC5200 provides Tval min of 1 ns (instead of 2 ns), which is a violation of the
>Timing Speci?cation for 33MHz.
>  
>
Yes, some cards are not detected because of this errata. Please note 
that this only happens if the card / chipset used is also not PCI timing 
spec compliant. A compliant card / chipset needs to be able to handle 0 
ns Tval(min). And some cards say "3.3 V compatible" but they aren't 
because either 3.3 V is simply not enough or they do nasty things like 
shortening the 5 V and 3.3 V power supply. That's always worth a check 
before inserting the card in a 3.3 V / 5 V system.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-13  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-13  7:00 AW: [U-Boot-Users] LITE5200 board: Bus Fault with 2 network cards Martin Krause
2004-07-13  7:47 ` Mark Jonas [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-13  7:15 Reinhard Meyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F3939C.2080300@freescale.com \
    --to=mark.jonas@freescale.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.