From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkoDa-0002In-At for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:10:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkoDX-0002Ib-WF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:10:58 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BkoDX-0002IY-Sp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:10:55 -0400 Received: from [193.140.164.20] (helo=ankara.baskent.edu.tr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BkoAE-0007UD-Gi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 14:07:30 -0400 Received: from [195.174.149.205] (IDENT:1000@[195.174.149.205]) by ankara.baskent.edu.tr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i6EI7JNS025953 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:07:20 +0300 (EET DST) Message-ID: <40F5764F.9070309@baskent.edu.tr> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:07:11 +0300 From: Emre Ersin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] which libraries? Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Which versions of libraries (sdl,gcc,glibc,alsa-lib etc.) should I use to produce a working qemu-fast? I am using; gcc-3.3.4 libc-2.3.2 SDL-1.2 libasound-2.0 make-3.8 and without sdl (without graphical interface) I think qemu-fast runs. So Is there a problem inside sdl.c?