From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40F65985.9090905@fh-landshut.de> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:16:37 +0200 From: Oliver Korpilla Reply-To: okorpil@fh-landshut.de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?I=F1igo_Lopez_Barranco?= Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Little survey: SCM systems? References: <42A622EB18325843894BB8E1040E3DF5022792@sinaexchf> In-Reply-To: <42A622EB18325843894BB8E1040E3DF5022792@sinaexchf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Iņigo Lopez Barranco wrote: > >I would like to know which software configuration system (SCM) have >you people tried. I found a nice comparison between different systems >in http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/ and Vesta seems really >interesting. Anyone has tried it? No, sorry. >We're using CVS right now, but it has some limitations wich can become >quite bothering. Also, we have to compile for several different >platforms, using different toolchains, etc. Any SCM that you would >recommend for this kind of development. I currently used Subversion, after being disappointed with the usability of CVS. Somehow everything works in SVN as it should have in CVS - I mean, what I disliked about CVS, or found counter-intuitive, is different with SVN. Disclaimer: I've only used it for a "small scale" driver port and platform port project. But it seems to do quite well and I'm more efficient with it than with CVS. With kind regards, Oliver Korpilla ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/