From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: Again, some bad Reiser4 (ReiserFS) 'reviews' Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:43:14 -0700 Message-ID: <40F8AE62.5010908@namesys.com> References: <200407150025.30908.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <40F6C548.7030805@namesys.com> <20040715182209.GK21140@backtop.namesys.com> <20040716092927.GQ4990@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20040716092927.GQ4990@nysv.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: =?UTF-8?B?TWFya3VzIFTDtnJucXZpc3Q=?= Cc: Alex Zarochentsev , Dieter N?tzel , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Nikita Danilov Markus T=C3=B6rnqvist wrote: >On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:22:09PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: > =20 > >>>zam, would you confirm that the fibration plugin is our current default = >>>plugin? >>> =20 >>> >>"dot-o fibrate" is default. >> =20 >> > >This always puzzles me. Would not ext-1-fibre give the same results for > >This always puzzles me. Would not ext-1-fibre give the same results for >.o files but also the same bonus with all source code and such with .c >and .h? > >I at least overrode the default because of that :) > > =20 > nikita, is there a reason, or did inertia rule and we should change it?