From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe W Damasio Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 13:10:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout() Message-Id: <40FD19C7.4000602@terra.com.br> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============62024461260719221==" List-Id: References: <20040720130244.GE27492@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040720130244.GE27492@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============62024461260719221== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pavel Machek wrote: > I'm not sure it makes sense.... so it will just spin once more? Exact > timeout does not seem too critical here. So why not use HZ instead of 1000? Felipe -- It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html --===============62024461260719221== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============62024461260719221==--