From: Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@terra.com.br>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout()
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:42:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FD4B74.9070501@terra.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040720130244.GE27492@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 612 bytes --]
Hi,
Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> After discussing with Greg, longer delays were considered those
> measurable in milliseconds. I think msleep() helps add a layer of
> consistency across the board. It also is (IMO) easier to think of times
> and delays in terms of seconds / milliseconds rather than jiffies (this
> becomes very apparent in later patches, where all sorts of crazy
> conversions are replaced with simple numbers).
Yeah, you're right, msleep seems to be the right way to go.
Cheers,
Felipe
--
It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux. Read more at
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 13:02 [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout() with Pavel Machek
2004-07-20 13:08 ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout() Pavel Machek
2004-07-20 13:10 ` Felipe W Damasio
2004-07-20 16:17 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-07-20 16:20 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-07-20 16:23 ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout() with Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-07-20 16:24 ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout() Pavel Machek
2004-07-20 16:26 ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout() with Pavel Machek
2004-07-20 16:35 ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH] nbd: replace schedule_timeout() Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-07-20 16:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-07-20 16:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-07-20 16:42 ` Felipe W Damasio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40FD4B74.9070501@terra.com.br \
--to=felipewd@terra.com.br \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.