All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: "E. Gryaznova" <grev@namesys.com>
Cc: reiserfs-dev@namesys.com,
	Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@namesys.com>,
	David Dabbs <david@dabbs.net>,
	ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>,
	vs <vs@thebsh.namesys.com>
Subject: Reiser4 slowed down, Elena has found the changesets responsible, we will fix it.....
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:31:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4108A7DA.3020605@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410833F9.501@namesys.com>

I thought the list would be interested to know.

Zam, this is your task, except for the debugging code, which is vs's.

vs, I want you to ensure that it is not possible to leave debugging code 
on without being warned of it.

Good work elena.

Hans

E. Gryaznova wrote:

>
>>>
>> So, is reiser4 slower or is ext3 faster....?
>
>
> Hello.
>
> I tried to find what reiser4 changes cause the reiser4 CREATE 
> performance degradation.
>
> There is a "reiser4, CREATE" chart :
>
> http://www.namesys.com/intbenchmarks/mongo/04.07.26/256MB.RAM/reiser4-performance-degradation/charts/CREATE.png 
>
>
> (while reading this chart, please notice that some tests were 
> performed twice or more times)
>
> My conclusion is :
> 1) the first degradation was invited by 1.1614.1.1 snapshot :
> ChangeSet@1.1614.1.1, 2004-06-25 16:33:37+04:00, zam@crimson.namesys.com
>  flush_some_atom: force atom to commit if jnode_flush() does not 
> submit nodes to disk even if it
>  has progress in processing nodes (in case of large fragmented 
> overwrite set, for example).
>
> 2) for the second one the "vs debugging code" is responsible. It is 
> started from
> ChangeSet@1.1623, 2004-07-20 12:08:38+04:00, 
> reiser4@tribesman.namesys.com
>  debugging code
>
> Thanks,
> Lena.
>
>
>>
>> Zam, please comment.
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>
>
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-29  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-26  5:49 mongo benchmark results David Dabbs
2004-07-26  6:48 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-26  8:24   ` Nikita Danilov
2004-07-26  8:43     ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-07-25  8:21       ` Nikita Danilov
2004-07-26 11:01         ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-07-26  8:54       ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-07-26 17:08   ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-07-26 17:31     ` David Dabbs
2004-07-26 19:11       ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-26 19:45         ` David Dabbs
2004-07-26 19:18       ` Hans Reiser
     [not found]         ` <41056FFF.4010208@namesys.com>
     [not found]           ` <4105FDFA.1090308@namesys.com>
     [not found]             ` <410833F9.501@namesys.com>
2004-07-29  7:31               ` Hans Reiser [this message]
     [not found]               ` <20040729152103.GN4881@backtop.namesys.com>
     [not found]                 ` <410A57C6.3020501@namesys.com>
2004-07-30 18:28                   ` Reiser4 performance is almost completely restored now Hans Reiser
2004-07-26 19:41       ` mongo benchmark results E. Gryaznova
2004-07-26 20:00         ` David Dabbs
2004-07-26 20:06           ` E. Gryaznova
2004-07-29  3:13             ` David Dabbs
2004-07-30 15:16               ` E. Gryaznova
2004-07-30 16:11                 ` David Dabbs
2004-07-30 18:57                 ` Reiser4 performance is almost completely restored now David Dabbs
2004-07-30 19:01                   ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-07-30 20:37                 ` Unattended mongo benchmark? David Dabbs
2004-07-31  5:19                   ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-31 11:00                     ` Nikita Danilov
2004-07-31 14:16                       ` David Dabbs
2004-07-30 21:46                         ` Nikita Danilov
2004-07-31 14:46                         ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2004-07-30 21:59                           ` Nikita Danilov
2004-07-31 15:13                             ` David Dabbs
2004-07-31 16:48                               ` Vladimir V. Saveliev
2004-07-27  7:20         ` mongo benchmark results Hans Reiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4108A7DA.3020605@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=david@dabbs.net \
    --cc=grev@namesys.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-dev@namesys.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    --cc=vs@thebsh.namesys.com \
    --cc=zam@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.