From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4109B225.8020604@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 21:27:49 -0500 From: Corey Minyard MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, Kumar Gala Subject: Re: Patch for debug setcontext References: <41090F9A.8000901@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: I'm using stock 2.6.7. Is there a different kernel I should be using? -Corey Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 29, 2004, at 9:54 AM, Corey Minyard wrote: > >> Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> > I'm guessing, this should really be #if defined(CONFIG_4xx) || >> > defined(CONFIG_BOOKE) >> > There are a number of similar cases later in this code as well. >> >> That may be the case, but it is very confusing in entry.S. The dbcr0 >> register seems to only be defined on 4xx processor, not on book E. >> Look, for instance, at load_4xx_dbcr0:, it is only defined if 4xx is >> enabled, not if book E is enabled. > > > Corey, > > I think you may have an old linux-2.6 tree. I remember renaming > load_4xx_dbcr0 to just load_dbcr0 because of such issues. Hopefully a > newer tree (one with e500 support, if its going head_e500.S) should be > cleaner. If not, let me know. > > - kumar > ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/