From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: sctp conntrack Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 13:37:30 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <410E277A.3050202@eurodev.net> References: <20040722191649.GJ14946@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> <200407271348.34615.immidi@spymac.com> <20040801165005.GA14539@sunbeam2> <200408021555.38315.immidi@spymac.com> <20040802110522.GN18758@sunbeam2> <410E26DB.2070307@eurodev.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Harald Welte , Kiran Kumar , Netfilter Development Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <410E26DB.2070307@eurodev.net> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi again, I forgot something... Pablo Neira wrote: >-#define NET_IP_CONNTRACK_MAX 2089 >- > static ctl_table ip_ct_netfilter_table[] = { > { > .ctl_name = NET_IPV4_NETFILTER, >@@ -460,14 +458,6 @@ > .mode = 0555, > .child = ip_ct_sysctl_table, > }, >- { >- .ctl_name = NET_IP_CONNTRACK_MAX, >- .procname = "ip_conntrack_max", >- .data = &ip_conntrack_max, >- .maxlen = sizeof(int), >- .mode = 0644, >- .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec >- }, > { .ctl_name = 0 } > }; > > > ip_conntrack_max is duplicated, is there any reason to do so? that's why I remove that entry in the sysctl table. regards, Pablo