From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267944AbUHEUIv (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:08:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267933AbUHEUIv (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:08:51 -0400 Received: from fecls-03.atlarge.net ([129.41.63.139]:16201 "HELO fecls-03.atlarge.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267941AbUHEUGj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:06:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4112917A.3080003@cse.wustl.edu> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:58:50 -0500 From: "Mr. Berkley Shands" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: Severe I/O performance regression 2.6.6 to 2.6.7 or 2.6.8-rc3 References: <41126811.7020607@dssimail.com> <20040805172531.GC17188@holomorphy.com> In-Reply-To: <20040805172531.GC17188@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2004 20:00:21.0468 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6B9A1C0:01C47B26] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: >By any chance could you do binary search on the bk snapshots between >2.6.6 and 2.6.7? > > >-- wli > > > the problem does not exist using 2.6.6-bk6, but exists on 2.6.6-bk7. -bk8 and -bk9 faile to build. these are from patches-2.6.6-bk6 off snapshots/old and applied to a vanilla 2.6.6 kernel. berkley