From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zombie.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i76ELSrT012317 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:21:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gotham.columbia.tresys.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7]) by zombie.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i76ELNO0023464 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:21:23 GMT Message-ID: <411393AB.6020305@tresys.com> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:20:27 -0400 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Russell Coker , Daniel J Walsh , selinux-dev@tresys.com Subject: Re: Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunables with booleans? References: <200404141453.i3EEr2Jx015745@gotham.columbia.tresys.com> <1091472796.23449.248.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <1091800968.8590.39.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1091800968.8590.39.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 14:53, Stephen Smalley wrote: > >>As a minor issue, we should also reconsider the names of the boolean >>utilities, as they are too generic and could easily conflict in the >>future with other non-SELinux programs. Also, Chris PeBenito posted a >>toggle_bool utility a while back that would likely be useful to add. > > > change_bool -> change_sebool > show_bools -> show_sebools > toggle_bool -> toggle_sebool > If they are going to be changed they should probably also be changed to match the get/set convention used by most other selinux apps. Joshua Brindle -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.