From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i76EcNrT012486 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i76Ebgpu003601 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:37:48 GMT Message-ID: <411397C9.2010606@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:38:01 -0400 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: Joshua Brindle , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Russell Coker , selinux-dev@tresys.com Subject: Re: Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunables with booleans? References: <200404141453.i3EEr2Jx015745@gotham.columbia.tresys.com> <1091472796.23449.248.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <1091800968.8590.39.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <411393AB.6020305@tresys.com> <1091802482.8590.62.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1091802482.8590.62.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: >On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 10:20, Joshua Brindle wrote: > > >>If they are going to be changed they should probably also be changed to >>match the get/set convention used by most other selinux apps. >> >> > >I can see renaming change_bool to setsebool or something similar, and >adding a new getsebool that just displays the value of the >specified boolean. show_bools is a little different in that it shows >all booleans and their values, so possibly listsebools. toggle_sebool >has no equivalent. > > show_bools should be getseboo -a. Dan -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.