From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 bitops.h commentary on instruction reordering
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 19:36:25 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4113A579.5060702@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040806143359.GC20911@logos.cnet>
Thanks.
One more question, if you don't object. How after some variable
assigment to make other CPUs *immediatelly* see the assigned value, i.e.
to make current CPU immediately flush its write cache in memory? *mb()
seems deal with reordering, barrier() with the compiler optimization (am
I right?). The similar memory barrier spin_lock() does, but it's not
easy to uderstand its internal magic.
Vlad
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 06:17:04PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>
>>So, is there any way to workaround this problem, i.e. prevent bit
>>operations reordering on non-x86 architectures? Some kinds of memory
>>barriers?
>
>
> Memory barriers, yes, smp_mb(), rmb, wmb and friends.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-06 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-05 20:06 [PATCH] x86 bitops.h commentary on instruction reordering Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-06 14:17 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-08-06 14:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-06 15:36 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
2004-08-06 15:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-06 16:52 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-08-06 17:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-06 22:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-08-07 1:01 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-08-07 22:16 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-09 15:14 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-08-09 15:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-09 17:35 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
[not found] ` <20040809183437.GD6361@logos.cnet>
2004-08-09 20:12 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-08-09 21:21 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-10 12:28 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2004-08-09 11:58 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] <2pY7Y-W1-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2qdJL-3sh-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2qePx-4eM-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2qf8S-4pI-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2qg4V-54c-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2qgoh-5og-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2qhkn-649-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2rkgh-zP-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2rlFk-1wC-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2rmhX-20I-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2roWw-40d-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2roWw-40d-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-09 21:23 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-10 12:26 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4113A579.5060702@vlnb.net \
--to=vst@vlnb.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.