All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Kaczmarski <fallow@op.pl>
Subject: [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU Scheduler Evaluation
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 11:44:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41143419.6000407@bigpond.net.au> (raw)

Version 3.1 of the various single priority array scheduler patches for 
2.6.7, 2.6.8-rc2 and 2.6.8-rc3 kernels are now available for evaluation.

This is a bug fix release to fix a problem caused by sched_clock() not 
being monotonic.  This meant that when measuring small time intervals by 
taking the difference between successive calls to sched_clock() there is 
a possibility of obtaining a negative value (or, as unsigned long longs 
are being used, a very big one).  One unfortunate consequence of this is 
that adding to non zero intervals together could lead to a zero result 
and possible divide by zero problems.


1. [ZAPHOD] Runtime selectable choice between a priority based or 
entitlement based O(1) scheduler with active/expired arrays replaced by 
a single array and an O(1) promotion mechanism plus scheduling 
statistics with new interactive bonus mechanism and throughput bonus 
mechanism:

2.6.7 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.7-spa_zaphod_FULL-v3.1?download>
2.6.8-rc2 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.8-rc2-spa_zaphod_FULL-v3.1?download>
2.6.8-rc3 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.8-rc3-spa_zaphod_FULL-v3.1?download>

2. Slightly modified version of Con Kolivas's staircase O(1) scheduler 
with active/expired arrays replaced by a single array and an O(1) 
promotion mechanism:

2.6.7 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.7-spa_sc_FULL-v3.1?download>
2.6.8-rc2 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.8-rc2-spa_sc_FULL-v3.1?download>
2.6.8-rc3 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.8-rc3-spa_sc_FULL-v3.1?download>

3. [HYDRA] Runtime selection between staircase, priority based and 
entitlement based O(1) schedulers:

2.6.7 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.7-spa_hydra_FULL-v3.1?download>
2.6.8-rc2 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.8-rc2-spa_hydra_FULL-v3.1?download>
2.6.8-rc3 
<http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/patch-2.6.8-rc3-spa_hydra_FULL-v3.1?download>

Other schedulers are also available from 
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/cpuse/>

So as not to interfere with the staircase scheduler's evaluation I do 
not propose to release patches for rc3-mm kernels unless requested.

I'm in the process of simplifying my schedulers (I got carried away with 
the theory) in order to reduce their overhead and hope to release a new 
slimmer version early next week.  Also on the "to do" list are CPU rate 
caps.

Peter
-- 
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
  -- Ambrose Bierce


             reply	other threads:[~2004-08-07  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-07  1:44 Peter Williams [this message]
     [not found] <2oEEn-197-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-02 13:27 ` [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU Scheduler Evaluation Andi Kleen
2004-08-03  0:27   ` Peter Williams
2004-08-03  3:53     ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-03  4:38       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-03  6:51       ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-02  6:31 Peter Williams
2004-08-02 13:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-03  0:33   ` Peter Williams
2004-08-03  2:03     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-03  3:39       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-03 10:49         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04  0:37           ` Peter Williams
2004-08-04  0:50             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04  1:36               ` Peter Williams
2004-08-04  1:51                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04  2:40                   ` Peter Williams
2004-08-04  7:05                     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-04  7:44                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-05  1:06                       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-05  2:00                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-05  2:12                           ` Peter Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41143419.6000407@bigpond.net.au \
    --to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=fallow@op.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.