All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Bug zapper?  :)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:09:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41180443.9030900@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408100042.37159.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>



Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Monday 09 August 2004 23:07, John Richard Moser wrote:
> 

[...]

> 
> 
> The flaw is that you think that kernel folks don't review their code.
> However, if you see some bad code, by all means - send a patch.
> 

Oh, no; as I said, even heavily quality assurance audited code has maybe 
5 bugs per kloc.  Where do the mremap() and munmap() bugs come from? 
Obviously you guys don't get everything.

> Asking others to do large amount of work is not very popular on this list.
> Do something yourself first.

Just do it in passing; you don't have to put a sudden hard effort to do 
these things in.  It'd be nice, but a major undertaking.

What I'm suggesting isn't much though, is it really?  Consider the 
functions function (normal code, not necessarily kernel):

void get_food(char **a) {
*a = malloc(strlen(global_food) + 1);
strcpy(*a, global_food);
}

/*Set our food*/
int set_food(char *food) {
if (!food)
return -1; /*error*/
free(global_food); /*if NULL, nothing happens*/
global_food = malloc(strlen(food) + 1);
strcpy(global_food, food);
return 0;
}

You'll have to forgive the lack of formatting; thunderbird is mean about 
this :/

Anyhow, as you can see, these are quite simple.  Function names are 
self-eplanitory, as is the process.  Assumedly, these are fine.

Now, we could try another approach at this, below.

/* get_food(char **a)
* Gets the current food.
*
* INPUT:
*  - char **a
*    Pointer to a pointer for the outputted food.
* OUTPUT:
*  - Return
*    none.
*  - *a
*    Set to a copy of the current food.
* PROCESS:
*  - Set '*a' to a newly allocated block of memory containing a copy
*    of the current food (global_food)
* STATE CHANGE:
*  none.
*/
void get_food(char **a) {
*a = malloc(strlen(global_food) + 1);
strcpy(*a, global_food);
}

/* set_food(char *food)
* Sets the current food.
*
* INPUT:
*  - char *food
*    Pointer to an ASCIIZ string containing the new food
* OUTPUT:
*  - Return
*    -1 on error
*    0 on success
* PROCESS:
*  - If (food is NULL)
*    - return error (-1)
*  - If (food is not NULL)
*    - Free current food (global_food)
*    - Set current food (global_food) to a newly allocated block
*      of memory containing a copy of 'food'
* STATE CHANGE:
*  - current food (global_food) is set to 'food'
*  - Memory holding previous food is freed
*/
int set_food(char *food) {
if (!food)
return -1; /*error*/
free(global_food); /*if NULL, nothing happens*/
global_food = malloc(strlen(food) + 1);
strcpy(global_food, food);
return 0;
}


These comment blocks are *MUCH* more verbose.  They describe the process 
loosely, but do give enough information to allow understanding without 
questions.

The large amount of extra commentary is worth it, IMHO.
> --
> vda
> 
> 

-- 
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-08-09 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-09 20:07 [RFC] Bug zapper? :) John Richard Moser
     [not found] ` <200408100042.37159.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
2004-08-09 23:09   ` John Richard Moser [this message]
2004-08-10  0:58     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-10  1:55       ` Tommy Reynolds
2004-08-10  2:47     ` Rik van Riel
2004-08-10  3:13       ` John Richard Moser
2004-08-10  8:35     ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-08-10 15:19       ` John Richard Moser
2004-08-10 21:43         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-08-10 21:30 ` V13
2004-08-10 23:35   ` John Richard Moser
2004-08-11  4:50   ` Bernd Eckenfels
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-10 21:13 Nick Warne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41180443.9030900@comcast.net \
    --to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.