From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: implementing reiserfs in C++ for a new OS
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:36:51 -0700
Message-ID: <411A5933.90408@namesys.com>
References: <71d3364904080706112e72fb6b@mail.gmail.com>	<20040809172437.GP1284@nysv.org>	<71d3364904080922267e8c14af@mail.gmail.com>	<200408101312.48888.reiserfs-list@quinnh.org>	<4119273E.1040104@namesys.com>	<20040810211951.GU1284@nysv.org>	<41194690.5050908@namesys.com>	<1365645117.20040811065416@tnonline.net>	<4119B7D1.7000705@namesys.com>	<16665.61639.659924.562747@laputa.namesys.com>	<411A4CA1.9090604@namesys.com> <16666.20331.980571.419171@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-20202-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <16666.20331.980571.419171@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Spam <spam@tnonline.net>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Nikita Danilov wrote:

>Hans Reiser writes:
> > Nikita Danilov wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >Copyright to result of translation belongs to the translator. At
> > >least, according to Russian law.
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > I may be completely wrong legally, esp. in Russia.  I personally think 
> > it should belong to the original author if the original copyright is 
> > still valid.
> > 
> > Otherwise harry potter can get translated and no need to pay rowling.
>
>`Otherwise' is non-sequitur. One pays royalties to get a permission to
>produce and/or sell derived work. But copyright to derived work lies
>with translator.
> 
>Otherwise, copyright to reiser4 (re-)implementation of allocate-on-flush
>belongs to SGI.
>  
>
I would feel more guilty about that if their team had not gone so far 
out of their way to encourage me to learn and use their most valuable 
innovation when I visited SGI.  I try to credit SGI on that generally, 
but folks are welcome to point out where an additional credit is needed 
(it is too easy to neglect such things).  I do think that I took their 
idea to the next level....

> > 
> > Hans
>
>Nikita.
>
>
>  
>