From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dr. Giovanni A. Orlando" Subject: Re: implementing reiserfs in C++ for a new OS Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:42:17 +0200 Message-ID: <411A5A79.1040204@futuretg.com> References: <71d3364904080706112e72fb6b@mail.gmail.com> <20040809172437.GP1284@nysv.org> <71d3364904080922267e8c14af@mail.gmail.com> <200408101312.48888.reiserfs-list@quinnh.org> <4119273E.1040104@namesys.com> <20040810211951.GU1284@nysv.org> <41194690.5050908@namesys.com> <1365645117.20040811065416@tnonline.net> <4119B7D1.7000705@namesys.com> <16665.61639.659924.562747@laputa.namesys.com> <411A4CA1.9090604@namesys.com> <16666.20331.980571.419171@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <411A5933.90408@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <411A5933.90408@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Nikita Danilov , Spam , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hans Reiser wrote: > Nikita Danilov wrote: > >> Hans Reiser writes: >> > Nikita Danilov wrote: >> > > > >> > >Copyright to result of translation belongs to the translator. At >> > >least, according to Russian law. >> > > >> > > > > >> > I may be completely wrong legally, esp. in Russia. I personally >> think > it should belong to the original author if the original >> copyright is > still valid. >> > > Otherwise harry potter can get translated and no need to pay >> rowling. >> >> `Otherwise' is non-sequitur. One pays royalties to get a permission to >> produce and/or sell derived work. But copyright to derived work lies >> with translator. >> >> Otherwise, copyright to reiser4 (re-)implementation of allocate-on-flush >> belongs to SGI. >> >> > I would feel more guilty about that if their team had not gone so far > out of their way to encourage me to learn and use their most valuable > innovation when I visited SGI. I try to credit SGI on that generally, > but folks are welcome to point out where an additional credit is > needed (it is too easy to neglect such things). I do think that I > took their idea to the next level.... There are no problems at all. Both projects are GPL. Thanks, Giovanni > >> > > Hans >> >> Nikita. >> >> >> >> > -- -- -- Check FT Websites ... http://www.futuretg.com - ftp://ftp.futuretg.com http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com http://www.FTLinuxCourse.com/Certification http://www.rpmparadaise.org http://GNULinuxUtilities.com http://www.YourPersonalOperatingSystem.com --