From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Greaves Subject: Re: implementing reiserfs in C++ for a new OS Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 23:04:47 +0100 Message-ID: <411A97FF.9050205@dgreaves.com> References: <71d3364904080706112e72fb6b@mail.gmail.com> <41151698.3020508@namesys.com> <71d3364904080907361d3d7064@mail.gmail.com> <41178FA8.80107@futuretg.com> <20040809151252.GN1284@nysv.org> <411796CC.6070509@futuretg.com> <20040809153556.GO1284@nysv.org> <20040809170145.GE5429@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20040809172437.GP1284@nysv.org> <71d3364904080922267e8c14af@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <71d3364904080922267e8c14af@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Ramachandra K Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ramachandra K wrote: |Let me clarify that the nature of Capital project is academic research. | |rgds |Ram As an enquiry - why not use the GPL? Your messages imply that you are concerned about using it and want to avoid that. A lot of people are sensitive about the morals around GPL code. Although I have no standing here I'd be interested to hear and it may help calm those who worry. Your messages to the list can be interpreted in various ways - and some interpretations are not in keeping with the philosophical basis of the GPL - maybe you could clarify :) David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBGpf/8LvjTle4P1gRAoePAJ9h8eEvQbuTUASm67Qok/sf/u+PewCfd8lI eyDtXXCd8faMORDXH1tmO1I= =T1qi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----