From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Crypto(compress) plugin stability
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:46:40 -0700
Message-ID: <411BBB10.5020308@namesys.com>
References: <87isbogqfs.fsf@barad-dur.crans.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-20236-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <87isbogqfs.fsf@barad-dur.crans.org>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Mathieu Segaud <matt@minas-morgul.org>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Mathieu Segaud wrote:

>Hi !
>
>I've got a question about Reiser4 encryption ? Is it stable enough to run
>other things than test run or benchmarks ? :)
>  
>
No.

>I'm curently running my desktop box with several partitions encrypted thru
>dm-crypt. I know pros of Reiser4, which are: encryption at flush time,
>selection of files to be encrypted, speed of Reiser4 :)
>But are there problems with this plugin ? Is it stable enough to be trustworthy ?
>(I'm used to living on the bleeding edge, with my linux boxes)
>  
>
Wait a few, ok?

>I'm willing to switch but do I risk serious damages to my system :))) ?
>(I know I do, but I do not stress it a lot)
>
>Regards
>
>  
>