From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: useability issue with iproute2 -- unexpected behaviour
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:38:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <411BE35E.6010406@nortelnetworks.com> (raw)
I tried running the command "ip ro del default table 100" on a system that did
not have advanced routing support compiled in.
Let's just say I was kind of surprised when it took down the default route on
the *main* routing table.
Is this expected behaviour? I would expect some sort of error saying that
routing table 100 was not accessable, or something similar.
Thanks,
Chris
reply other threads:[~2004-08-12 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=411BE35E.6010406@nortelnetworks.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.