From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>,
Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiserfsprogs patches
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:48:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41226105.3050109@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41222B6F.4090000@suse.com>
Thanks Jeff, Vitaly will review.
Hans
Jeff Mahoney wrote:
>
> Hey all -
>
> The SuSE copy of reiserfsprogs has a number of patches, mostly backports
> of fixes. The attached patches are the ones that are fixes, as of
> 3.6.18, we still apply to our tree and that I feel should be considered
> for inclusion in the official reiserfsprogs release.
>
> Here's the rundown:
> 03-cleanly-unmounted
> - Just a cosmetic fix to change "cleanly umounted" to "clean"
> in a few warnings
>
> 04-quota_sd_blocks-2
> - Fixes fsck incorrectly warning about block counts for
> symlinks when quotas are enabled
>
> 07-auto_quiet.diff
> - Makes -a mode run quietly
>
> 10-blkgetsiz64.patch
> - The BLKGETSIZE64 ioctl was, in earlier kernels, incorrectly
> prototyped with sizeof (__u64), which expanded to
> sizeof(sizeof (__u64)) - making it a size_t
>
> Please consider applying.
>
> -Jeff
>
> --
> Jeff Mahoney
> SuSE Labs
>-------------------------
>Index: reiserfsprogs-3.6.13/fsck/main.c
>===================================================================
>--- reiserfsprogs-3.6.13.orig/fsck/main.c 2004-02-17
07:06:23.000000000 -0500
>+++ reiserfsprogs-3.6.13/fsck/main.c 2004-03-08 10:40:14.382396213
-0500
>@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void clean_attributes (reiserfs_f
time (&t);
if (get_sb_umount_state (fs->fs_ondisk_sb) != FS_CLEANLY_UMOUNTED) {
>- fsck_progress ("Filesystem does not look cleanly umounted\n"
>+ fsck_progress ("Filesystem is not clean\n"
"Check consistency of the partition first.\n");
exit(EXIT_USER);
}
>Index: reiserfsprogs-3.6.13/reiserfscore/prints.c
>===================================================================
>--- reiserfsprogs-3.6.13.orig/reiserfscore/prints.c 2004-02-17
07:06:23.000000000 -0500
>+++ reiserfsprogs-3.6.13/reiserfscore/prints.c 2004-03-08
10:41:23.648594772 -0500
>@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ int print_super_block (FILE * fp, reiser
"bitmaps, data, reserved] blocks): %u\n",
get_sb_free_blocks (sb));
reiserfs_warning (fp, "Root block: %u\n", get_sb_root_block (sb));
}
>- reiserfs_warning (fp, "Filesystem marked as %scleanly umounted\n",
>+ reiserfs_warning (fp, "Filesystem is %sclean\n",
(get_sb_umount_state (sb) == FS_CLEANLY_UMOUNTED) ? "" :
"NOT ");
if (short_print)
>-------------------------
>diff -ur reiserfsprogs-3.6.4/fsck/semantic_rebuild.c
reiserfsprogs-3.6.4.suse/fsck/semantic_rebuild.c
>--- reiserfsprogs-3.6.4/fsck/semantic_rebuild.c 2002-09-13
05:41:41.000000000 -0400
>+++ reiserfsprogs-3.6.4.suse/fsck/semantic_rebuild.c 2003-02-11
10:36:49.000000000 -0500
>@@ -169,7 +169,8 @@
int ret = 0;
if (S_ISREG (mode) || S_ISLNK (mode) || S_ISDIR (mode)) {
>- if (*blocks != sd_blocks) {
>+ if ((!S_ISLNK(mode) && *blocks != sd_blocks) ||
>+ (S_ISLNK(mode) && *blocks != sd_blocks && (ROUND_UP(*blocks)
!= sd_blocks))) {
fsck_log ("vpf-10680: The %s %K has the wrong block count in the
StatData "
"(%u)%s(%u)\n", S_ISDIR (mode) ? "directory" : "file", key,
sd_blocks,
fsck_mode(fs) == FSCK_CHECK ? ", should be " : " - corrected to
", *blocks);
>-------------------------
>--- progs/fsck/main.c.1 2003-09-01 12:44:41.000000000 -0400
>+++ progs/fsck/main.c 2003-09-01 12:44:46.000000000 -0400
>@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@
case 'a':
case 'p':
>+ data->options |= OPT_QUIET;
mode = FSCK_AUTO;
break;
>-------------------------
>--- reiserfsprogs-3.6.13/lib/misc.c.blkgetsiz64 2004-05-18
16:50:47.000000000 +0200
>+++ reiserfsprogs-3.6.13/lib/misc.c 2004-05-18 16:53:19.000000000 +0200
>@@ -463,7 +463,13 @@
}
#if defined(__linux__) && defined(_IOR) && !defined(BLKGETSIZE64)
>-# define BLKGETSIZE64 _IOR(0x12, 114, __u64)
>+/* Note! Despite this call being called with *64, it must be encoded to
>+ * return only sizeof(size_t), since in earlier kernel versions it was
>+ * declared _IOR(0x12, 114, sizeof(u64)), making it use
sizeof(sizeof(u64)).
>+ *
>+ * However, the call itself does always return 64bit!
>+ */
>+# define BLKGETSIZE64 _IOR(0x12, 114, size_t)
#endif
/* To not have problem with last sectors on the block device when switching
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-17 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-17 15:59 reiserfsprogs patches Jeff Mahoney
2004-08-17 19:48 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41226105.3050109@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
--cc=vitaly@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.